Comparison of the 3D Modelling File Formats

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest

The Comparison of the 3D Modelling File Formats. People have stored information since the invention of writing. Before 3D scanning, dental professionals and laboratory technicians kept physical models and paper files. Instead of cabinets, computers are used to store digital data. Because file formats encrypt data for computer storage, programs must be able to recognize and access the file format to utilize the data.

In file formats for renderings, the geometry of a 3D model is encoded. All three of constructive solid geometry, precise mesh, and approximate mesh serve a purpose (CSG).

Because high-resolution printing is not possible with 3D printers, the geometry is encoded using a coarse mesh. Approximate mesh employs tessellation, covering a surface with geometric tiles. It is effortless to tile. During this procedure, the model’s color and texture are saved. The CAD/CAM system is produced when CAD generates the 3D printing file and CAM processes it.

STL, OBJ, and PLY are the three file formats most frequently used in 3D printing.

STL is generally the most common file format for 3D printing and using approximate mesh. Triangles also referred to as facets, are the fundamental building blocks of STL files and are used to cover the surface of 2D shapes. STL is superior to other file formats in several ways. First, collaboration is simplified by its widespread acceptance and use. In addition, STL files are simple and compact, which expedites processing.

STL files have a significant disadvantage. Tessellation only affects the surface, so the files only contain the geometry of the surface without color or texture representation. STL files are ideal if you only need a single color or texture, which is typically the case, but other formats are becoming increasingly popular as printers improve and the demand for color increases. Resolution is an additional issue with STL files. Maintaining a high resolution or encoding larger objects requires more triangles, which increases the file size. More time is needed to process larger files.

The OBJ and PLY file formats were created to fill the space left by the STL file format. Both can store characteristics such as color and texture. Despite being less popular than STL files, OBJ and PLY are well-known and frequently used for their ability to store color, texture, and other details. Both files are anticipated to have greater future relevance than STL files and will benefit from more advanced 3D printers.

Is there a definitively superior file format? It depends mainly on your situation and requirements. However, one thing is sure: both file formats and 3D printers will improve over time.

Vladyslav Pereverzyev foto

Vladyslav Pereverzyev

Dental Technician

Digital dentistry is my area of expertise, my passion for this field and dedication to technological innovation continually propel me to pursue new challenges. I consistently enhance my skills and knowledge to remain at the forefront of advancements in methods and technology. Additionally, I actively contribute my insights and expertise to the dental community through educational publications, including books, blogs, and professional journals.
Vladyslav Pereverzyev foto

Vladyslav Pereverzyev

Dental Technician

Digital dentistry is my area of expertise, my passion for this field and dedication to technological innovation continually propel me to pursue new challenges. I consistently enhance my skills and knowledge to remain at the forefront of advancements in methods and technology. Additionally, I actively contribute my insights and expertise to the dental community through educational publications, including books, blogs, and professional journals.

Latest article

In today’s fast-paced world of digital dentistry, staying ahead means mastering the right tools. Blender for Dental is rapidly becoming an industry standard, offering unparalleled precision in 3D modeling, digital wax-ups, and smile design. However, like any powerful software, Blender comes with a learning curve—one that can either slow you down or propel you forward, depending on how you approach it.
In modern dentistry, achieving precise occlusal alignment is crucial for ensuring patient comfort, long-term stability, and the success of restorations. Bite-Finder is an innovative tool designed to enhance occlusal analysis by providing accurate, data-driven insights into a patient’s bite. With its integration into digital workflows, Bite-Finder is transforming the way dentists and dental technicians diagnose and manage occlusal discrepancies.
In the evolving landscape of digital dentistry, precision and efficiency are the pillars of success. The Dacos system by MetaDac is an innovative solution designed specifically for seamless integration with Blender for Dental. This system revolutionizes the process of mounting models in articulators by combining cutting-edge calibration technology with minimal plaster use, making it compatible with all types of articulators.
In the ever-evolving world of digital dentistry, efficiency and precision are paramount. Dentag's Rotoclick system is a groundbreaking innovation that takes the integration of articulator-mounted workflows in exocad to the next level. With a single click, this system allows dental professionals to create highly accurate articulator setups, streamlining the entire design and production process.